In this page talks about ( Robert Blake Whitehill ) It was sent to us on 11/06/2021 and was presented on 11/06/2021 and the last update on this page on 11/06/2021
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. (ï½¡â—•â€¿â—•ï½¡) 09:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
*I am also nominating the following related pages:
North America1000 02:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
: Why? I came to this article because I was looking for information on a book series, and I found the information I was looking for. Clearly this article has been useful to someone. What's the point of deleting it, other than to satisfy some deletionist philosophy? I say keep the article. SimpsonDG (talk) 02:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Notability must be established. You can't argue for inclusion by saying WP:ITSUSEFUL. Tokyogirl79 (ï½¡â—•â€¿â—•ï½¡) 03:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
*This isn't a deletionist thing and if you can provide sources that show he's gained enough coverage to show that he's passed WP:NAUTHOR then I'm willing to withdraw. However saying that you and others may have found this useful isn't an argument for inclusion. To be fair, I'm going to ping . If anyone can help find coverage or justify inclusion, he can. Tokyogirl79 (ï½¡â—•â€¿â—•ï½¡) 03:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.